Kohistan Batholith
Cretaceous to Oligocene (c. 104-26 Ma; Stage 1 c. 104 Ma pre-suturing, Stages 2-3 c. 85-26 Ma post-suturing)
Kohistan Arc · Kohistan Batholith
Cretaceous-Paleogene in the time scale →Cited in 8 sources Last reviewed Aug 2, 2026
- Rank
- complex
- Status
- Published
- Age
- Mesozoic · Cretaceous-PaleogeneCretaceous to Oligocene (c. 104-26 Ma; Stage 1 c. 104 Ma pre-suturing, Stages 2-3 c. 85-26 Ma post-suturing)
- Named by
- Petterson & Windley (1985)
- Type locality
- Northern Kohistan (Gilgit-Chalt-Hunza belt), intruding the Jaglot and Chalt sequences.
- Thickness
- Not recorded
- Lithology
- Calc-alkaline gabbroic to granitoid plutons — tonalites (e.g. the Matum Das Stage-1 tonalite), diorites, granodiorites, granites and granite sheets (e.g. Parri, Indus Confluence).
- Synonyms
- Not recorded
The Kohistan Batholith is the calc-alkaline gabbroic-to-granitoid plutonic suite intruding the northern Kohistan arc, divided (Petterson & Windley 1985) into three stages: Stage 1 plutons (c. 104 Ma) predate suturing to Asia and are deformed with the Jaglot Group, while Stage 2 (from c. 85 Ma) and Stage 3 (to c. 26 Ma) plutons postdate suturing. Its isotopic evolution records a shift from mantle-derived to increasingly crust-derived magmas, interpreted as arc thickening and lower-arc melting after suturing.
Fossils
Not recorded
Contacts
Lower contact — not recorded; upper contact — intrusive.
Band colour = period; texture = dominant rock type. Lines between bands mark the contact type; dotted = no contact recorded in the sources (not a claim of conformity). True scale makes height ∝ recorded thickness; hatched = thickness not recorded. Ages approximate, for ordering.
This unit (highlighted) within its province column; faded ends continue above and below. Line style marks the contact type.
Distribution & setting
- Basin
- Kohistan Arc
- Region
- Kohistan Batholith
- Depositional environment
- volcanic-arc, plutonic
- Coordinates
- Not recorded
Correlation
Not recorded. Compare this unit against other basins on the correlation panel →
Economic significance
Not recorded
Remarks
The principal arc-plutonic record of Kohistan; the deformed Stage-1 (pre-suturing) versus undeformed Stage 2-3 (post-suturing) plutons provide the main relative-dating framework for the arc. Stage-2 plutonism (from c. 85 Ma) was driven by heat from Chilas Complex emplacement.
Research notes (3)
Field-by-field findings drawn from the cited literature. Every statement is traced to a registered source — follow a citation for the full reference.
Age & correlation (2)
-
Hanson (1989): in the Shigar-valley arc terrane two intrusive phases are exposed — a pre-tectonic, possibly tholeiitic phase about 100 Ma old, and a post-tectonic, calc-alkaline to subalkaline phase 40–60 Ma old — bracketing deformation along the Northern Suture. Madin et al. (1989) group the Mesozoic to middle-Cenozoic mafic metasedimentary and intrusive arc rocks obducted onto the Indian margin along the MMT as the 'Kohistan Sequence'.
-
Petterson & Windley (1985): Rb-Sr whole-rock isochrons date the arc-batholith in three stages — the deformed first-stage Matum Das tonalite at 102±12 Ma (intra-oceanic, pre-collision; initial 87Sr/86Sr 0.7039) and second-stage Gilgit granitoids at 54±4 Ma and 40±6 Ma (Andean-type, post-collision), with post-collisional Indus Confluence aplite-pegmatite sheets at 34±14 and 29±8 Ma; major deformation fell between 102 and 54 Ma. This is the primary source for the three-stage age model, reviewed and extended by Petterson (2010, 2018).
Geological significance (1)
-
Khan et al. (1989): the Kohistan–Ladakh island arc formed by northward subduction of neo-Tethyan oceanic lithosphere in Late Jurassic to Cretaceous time and extends for at least 1,000 km across the western Himalaya, southern Karakoram and eastern Hindu Kush. It is juxtaposed against the Asian plate to the north along the Main Karakoram Thrust (MKT) and against the Indian plate to the south along the Main Mantle Thrust (MMT), and comprises calc-alkaline volcanics, intra-arc sediments (with Aptian–Albian fossils) and diorite–tonalite–granite plutons; the earliest tonalite–diorite plutons have isotopic ages of 110–95 Ma.
Khan, M.A., Jan, M.Q., Windley, B.F., Tarney, J. & Thirlwall, M.F. (1989)
Sources (6)
- Treloar, P.J., Petterson, M.G., Jan, M.Q. & Sullivan, M.A. (1996). A re-evaluation of the stratigraphy and evolution of the Kohistan arc sequence, Pakistan Himalaya. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 153, 681-693.
- Treloar, P.J., Petterson, M.G., Jan, M.Q. & Sullivan, M.A. (1996). A re-evaluation of the stratigraphy and evolution of the Kohistan arc sequence, Pakistan Himalaya: implications for magmatic and tectonic arc-building processes. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 153, 681-693.
- Kazmi, A.H. & Abbasi, I.A. (2008). Stratigraphy and Historical Geology of Pakistan. Department & National Centre of Excellence in Geology, University of Peshawar, Peshawar. 524 pp. ISBN 978-969-9119.
- Khan, M.A., Jan, M.Q., Windley, B.F., Tarney, J. & Thirlwall, M.F. (1989). The Chilas mafic-ultramafic igneous complex; the root of the Kohistan island arc in the Himalaya of northern Pakistan. In: Malinconico, L.L. & Lillie, R.J. (eds) Tectonics of the Western Himalayas. Geological Society of America Special Paper 232, 75-94.
- Hanson, C.R. (1989). The northern suture in the Shigar valley, Baltistan, northern Pakistan. In: Malinconico, L.L. & Lillie, R.J. (eds) Tectonics of the Western Himalayas. Geological Society of America Special Paper 232, 203-215.
- Madin, I.P., Lawrence, R.D. & Ur-Rehman, S. (1989). The northwestern Nanga Parbat-Haramosh massif; evidence for crustal uplift at the northwestern corner of the Indian craton. In: Malinconico, L.L. & Lillie, R.J. (eds) Tectonics of the Western Himalayas. Geological Society of America Special Paper 232, 169-182.
Every fact on this page is source-cited. This entry is part of the peer-archived Pakistan Stratigraphy Dataset (doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21363991, CC‑BY‑4.0).
Lexicon status: Defined in journal or other literature; not found in a GSP memoir. There is no body currently ratifying unit status, so provenance is shown in place of a formal ruling.
Cite this unit
Qudsi, L. (2026). Kohistan Batholith. In Pakistan Stratigraphy Dataset [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21363991
@misc{stratigraphypk_kohistanbatholith,
author = {Qudsi, Lareb},
title = {{Kohistan Batholith} --- Pakistan Stratigraphy Dataset},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Zenodo},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.21363991},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21363991}
} Archived dataset: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21363991 (CC‑BY‑4.0) · Direct link to this entry: https://stratigraphy.pk/formation/kohistan-batholith (accessed October 29, 2026).
To cite the unit's original definition instead, see: Petterson & Windley (1985).
Related units
Referenced in other successions
Underlain by Chilas Complex
Saved on this device only.