Nanga Parbat Gneiss
Mesoproterozoic to Neoproterozoic
Mesoproterozoic in the time scale →Cited in 5 sources Last reviewed Aug 2, 2026
- Rank
- Not recorded
- Status
- Published
- Age
- Precambrian · MesoproterozoicMesoproterozoic to Neoproterozoic
- Named by
- Not recorded
- Type locality
- Nanga Parbat massif, Gilgit-Baltistan
- Thickness
- 2000+ m
- Lithology
- Paragneiss, pelitic schist, calc-silicate, quartzite, marble
- Synonyms
- Not recorded
The metasedimentary cover of the Nanga Parbat massif - paragneiss, pelitic schist, calc-silicate, quartzite and marble metamorphosed to upper amphibolite facies, originally deposited on the Indian-plate margin.
Cover sequence of the Nanga Parbat massif metamorphosed to upper amphibolite facies. Contains metasedimentary rocks originally deposited as continental shelf sediments on Indian Plate margin.
Fossils
Not recorded
Contacts
Band colour = period; texture = dominant rock type. Lines between bands mark the contact type; dotted = no contact recorded in the sources (not a claim of conformity). True scale makes height ∝ recorded thickness; hatched = thickness not recorded. Ages approximate, for ordering.
This unit (highlighted) within its province column; faded ends continue above and below. Line style marks the contact type.
Distribution & setting
- Basin
- Not recorded
- Region
- Not recorded
- Depositional environment
- Not recorded
- Coordinates
- Not recorded
See it in the field
Geoheritage site where this unit is exposed at outcrop.
Correlation
Not recorded. Compare this unit against other basins on the correlation panel →
Economic significance
Not recorded
Remarks
Represents the metamorphosed continental-shelf cover of the Indian plate within the Nanga Parbat syntaxis; its protolith depositional age is only loosely constrained (Mesoproterozoic-Neoproterozoic) and remains debated.
Research notes (5)
Field-by-field findings drawn from the cited literature. Every statement is traced to a registered source — follow a citation for the full reference.
Age & correlation (2)
-
Kazmi & Jan (1997), after Tahirkheli (1987–1992): the amphibolite-facies Nanga Parbat Gneisses are dated at 1,800–2,700 Ma — an older span (Paleoproterozoic–Neoarchean) than the curated 'Mesoproterozoic to Neoproterozoic'; flagged for reconciliation.
Kazmi, A.H. & Jan, M.Q. (1997)
-
Zeitler et al. (1989): U/Pb zircon dating gives protolith ages of ~1850 Ma for the Iskere Gneiss and 400–500 Ma for the structurally lower Shengus Gneiss (which may be a metamorphosed equivalent of the Mansehra Granite and other Paleozoic S-type Himalayan granites). Critically, thin high-U zircon rims on the Iskere Gneiss yield 2.3–11 Ma ages, showing that the high-grade metamorphism of the massif is TERTIARY, not Precambrian — the curated Precambrian age applies to the protolith, not the metamorphic fabric.
Zeitler, P.K., Sutter, J.F., Williams, I.S., Zartman, R. & Tahirkheli, R.A.K. (1989)
Geological significance (3)
-
Kazmi & Jan (1997): the Nanga Parbat Gneisses form the >15 km-thick Proterozoic Nanga Parbat Group (Madin 1986) of the Nanga Parbat–Haramosh Massif (the Nanga Parbat Syntaxis, a re-entrant into the Kohistan arc), comprising the basal Shingus paragneiss, the Iskere orthogneiss, upper amphibolites and marbles, and the Haramosh Schist; the group is intruded by younger undeformed granites, pegmatites and mafic dykes. The Precambrian Salkhala Formation is thrust over the gneisses along the Shontargali Thrust (an MCT analogue), and the Liachar Thrust carries the high-grade gneisses onto Recent Indus-valley glacial sediments.
Kazmi, A.H. & Jan, M.Q. (1997)
-
Zeitler et al. (1989): the Nanga Parbat–Haramosh Massif — a north-pointing promontory of Indian-plate high-grade gneiss at the northwestern Himalayan syntaxis — reached peak metamorphic temperatures at 25–30 Ma. Its post-metamorphic cooling over the last 5–10 Ma has been controlled by the Raikhot Fault together with passive uplift beneath the overthrust Kohistan arc; net cooling rates for gneisses now at the Indus River accelerated from ~20 °C/Ma at ~20 Ma to ~300 °C/Ma at 0–0.4 Ma, recording extraordinarily rapid recent exhumation.
Zeitler, P.K., Sutter, J.F., Williams, I.S., Zartman, R. & Tahirkheli, R.A.K. (1989)
-
Madin et al. (1989): the western boundary of the Nanga Parbat–Haramosh Massif is not the Main Mantle Thrust but the younger, recently active dextral-reverse Raikot fault, which truncates the MMT and separates the Kohistan-arc rocks (Kohistan Sequence) from the high-grade Proterozoic metasediments (the 'Nanga Parbat Group') and orthogneisses of the Indian craton. The Raikot fault (mylonite zones plus discrete faults) accommodated ~15–25 km of late Cenozoic crustal uplift, appears to involve the Moho, and is interpreted as a terminal tear fault on the Main Central Thrust following a major — possibly pre-collision Indian-plate — crustal structure.
Sources (5)
- Malkani, M.S. & Mahmood, Z. (2017). Stratigraphy of Pakistan. Geological Survey of Pakistan, Memoir Vol. 24.
- Kazmi, A.H. & Jan, M.Q. (1997). Geology and Tectonics of Pakistan. Graphic Publishers, Karachi.
- Kazmi, A.H. & Abbasi, I.A. (2008). Stratigraphy and Historical Geology of Pakistan. Department & National Centre of Excellence in Geology, University of Peshawar, Peshawar. 524 pp. ISBN 978-969-9119.
- Zeitler, P.K., Sutter, J.F., Williams, I.S., Zartman, R. & Tahirkheli, R.A.K. (1989). Geochronology and temperature history of the Nanga Parbat-Haramosh Massif, Pakistan. In: Malinconico, L.L. & Lillie, R.J. (eds) Tectonics of the Western Himalayas. Geological Society of America Special Paper 232, 1-22.
- Madin, I.P., Lawrence, R.D. & Ur-Rehman, S. (1989). The northwestern Nanga Parbat-Haramosh massif; evidence for crustal uplift at the northwestern corner of the Indian craton. In: Malinconico, L.L. & Lillie, R.J. (eds) Tectonics of the Western Himalayas. Geological Society of America Special Paper 232, 169-182.
Reviewer confidence: medium
Every fact on this page is source-cited. This entry is part of the peer-archived Pakistan Stratigraphy Dataset (doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21363991, CC‑BY‑4.0).
Lexicon status: Appears in a single-author Geological Survey of Pakistan memoir (Malkani & Mahmood 2017), not cross-confirmed against the Shah lexicon. The Stratigraphic Committee of Pakistan is largely inactive, so documented provenance — not formal ratification — is the available signal.
Cite this unit
Qudsi, L. (2026). Nanga Parbat Gneiss. In Pakistan Stratigraphy Dataset [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21363991
@misc{stratigraphypk_nangaparbatgneiss,
author = {Qudsi, Lareb},
title = {{Nanga Parbat Gneiss} --- Pakistan Stratigraphy Dataset},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Zenodo},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.21363991},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21363991}
} Archived dataset: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21363991 (CC‑BY‑4.0) · Direct link to this entry: https://stratigraphy.pk/formation/nanga-parbat-gneiss (accessed October 29, 2026).
Related units
More from Nanga Parbat Massif
All units in Nanga Parbat Massif →Saved on this device only.